> We can’t change macroeconomic conditions, but we are undertaking and accelerating other initiatives to improve our results. One such initiative is making it simple [...]
As a naive person on the outside looking in, why are there no suggested changes to the clearly incorrect estimation approach, especially in volatile markets? If the numbers are not as expected why not look at expectation generation along with other factors instead of ignoring it? Or are they saying in so many words that they can't be blamed due to macroeconomic conditions? Sounds like such a volatile environment would require caution on these short term forecasts. Again I'm naive, I just didn't see it addressed.
As a naive person on the outside looking in, why are there no suggested changes to the clearly incorrect estimation approach, especially in volatile markets? If the numbers are not as expected why not look at expectation generation along with other factors instead of ignoring it? Or are they saying in so many words that they can't be blamed due to macroeconomic conditions? Sounds like such a volatile environment would require caution on these short term forecasts. Again I'm naive, I just didn't see it addressed.