Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Could a mod please change the link to the actual Court Opinion [1]? Both the linked article and the source that is cited omit a considerable amount of detail as to what actions are actually being proposed, the context of the threats (surrounding events and the platform YikYak, which requires proximity to participate in), and also completely ignores the actual suggestions made by the Court.

[1] http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/172220.P.pdf



TFA links the opinion in the very first sentence.


Reason.com omitting context and detail? Say it ain't so.


This isn't so much Reason as the Volokh Conspiracy (who used to be independent, then were hosted at the Washington Post for a few years, and now are at Reason). Specifically this is Eugene Volokh, who is usually very careful and said this in TFA: "I'm traveling, and thus won't have time to post a detailed analysis myself, but here's part of the analysis from Samantha Harris at FIRE:".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: