Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Article commits a classic fallacy: one bad example leading to a general statement because the latter makes a better headline.

Rather like going from ‘my friend’s house got robbed’ to ‘all houses get robbed’.



Because the author related 2 anecdotes din't mean they're the only ones they witnessed. They may have seen a pattern over time.


... which should be mentioned with numbers. Otherwise go by what's in the article - 2 anecdotes. My anecdote is that I'm > 40 but highly saught after engineer,by several CEOs far younger than me. But I know it does not mean that's the general pattern.

Edit: everything in the article was a good read, except the generalization in its title




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: