> ...doesn't "attack" american companies with covert implants.
Specific example aside, it's worth talking about why this does happen. "Black bag jobs" can mean "we didn't get a warrant", but they can also mean "we got a warrant and still aren't telling".
Even given a court order, there's still a possibility that employing surveillance by fiat will cause somebody to leak, or modify how they handle data, or simply reveal information about what sort of surveillance tools a given agency employs. Given that a FISA order can be obtained without a defendant, getting a court order and then doing the thing secretly anyway gives a sort of "bowling with bumpers" advantage where the project is approved if it gets revealed, but also done without revealing anything if it isn't.
More disturbingly, there's also substantial evidence that the NSA attacks companies covertly in places where they couldn't get a court order. Taking a specific device out of the supply chain and adding surveillance before it's shipped to the destination is a warrant-worthy project. Setting up systematic physical vulnerabilities with a use case of "turn it on some time in the future to get something interesting" isn't in the purview of a FISA order, so if the NSA did do that it would have to be without an order.
Wasn't PRISM all about attacking American companies with covert implants? For instance tapping into Google region to region data transfers, after which Google started encrypting everything.
I thought PRISM wasn't covert. Companies were compelled to allow them to install their sniffing hardware, it was all above-board. Snowden even leaked an internal slideshow with a nice timeline of when each tech company joined the program.
Parts of that whole expose were covert. In the case of Google we know by tapping fiber connections that they had between data centers (as sseth mentioned, using foreign intelligence peers to do an end run around legal protections), which was on Google owned fiber, theoretically entirely "in-house", so Google transferred it unencrypted. I believe they called this operation "Muscular". After the fiasco Google started assuming everything was hostile.
The program for tapping data center links had the internal code name MUSCULAR and was a partnership with the British GCHQ, who actually did the intercepting.
PRISM was at first reported as some sort of direct access to the servers of certain American companies, but it turned out to be the code name for a joint program with the FBI for using FISA warrants to request data from those companies.
I used to work in engineering at one of the big wireless telecoms. The impression that I got was that many of the outsourced services were compromised. For instance, we had zero control over our voice mail systems, they were outsourced to Amdocs.
You can see how this benefits the NSA; if the voice mail is outsourced to a foreign company, and the NSA buys intel from that company, it's technically not spying on US citizens, particularly if they're getting metadata.
..for insider trading. You are implying that he went to prison because of the NSA. He went to prison because he sold $52 million in stock after the intelligence community said they would no longer consider Qwest for classified government contracts because of his refusal to cooperate with the NSA.
He went to prison because he sold stock based on insider information. Regardless of the reasons for his trade, it was still insider information.
I find these attempts to distinguish between different state sponsored criminals to be a diversion and subterfuge.
Whether China or the US re-allocates your IP, you can expect a competing product made in China. That you might have a relationship with one of them probably doesn't change anything unless they actually think your firm is the best one for the job of maximizing the results on their tax base.
I mean maybe I'm wrong; would it make any sense that these Republics take private corporate property more seriously other parts of their Constitutions they have violated at least until caught?
The US makes the claim China does not and former president and CIA head George Bush floated corporate espionage as THE plan for handling the absurd costs of "intelligence" criminals after the cold war..
I'm always astounded that working in a competitive market seems to blind people to significant stated facts of the environment their market is operating in.
In nature, it might make sense to just outrun the weakest, after all, a bear has a limited appetite. But superpowers have unlimited apetites and will collapse like the USSR if they should ever expand slower than cancer.
