Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's why such change needs to be enforced simultaneously and externally.

As an example, I recall reading that tobacco companies were actually very happy about regulations limiting the marketing of tobacco products - by themselves, those regulations didn't change anything about their market share (the market was already saturated), but everyone got to stop spending so much on advertising.



Oh I'm sure Marlboro, who spent decades building a brand, wouldn't really care about newcomers not being able to advertise. That makes sense.


I don't think Marlboro cared about newcomers, a big company can usually buy out the small one if it gets dangerous. Consumers usually don't even notice.

Unrestricted advertising is basically Red Queen's race; capping it levels the playing field, so it's better for newcomers as well.


They especially don't care when they have no chance of growing to a level where they can get dangerous (because they can't advertise).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: