> Please don't call it C++ if it doesn't even support constructors and destructors.
At least they recognize this is missing, and call it out.
> Why not use GCC or LLVM as part of your project? That seems like a better investment of your time.
Learning opportunity? Maybe they're trying to solve a problem? Or do you think the LLVM folks should have just used GCC instead of wasting their time on LLVM?
At least they recognize this is missing, and call it out.
> Why not use GCC or LLVM as part of your project? That seems like a better investment of your time.
Learning opportunity? Maybe they're trying to solve a problem? Or do you think the LLVM folks should have just used GCC instead of wasting their time on LLVM?