Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Would the LHC blow up your hand? I do the math. (bbot.org)
65 points by sbierwagen on Oct 11, 2010 | hide | past | favorite | 16 comments



No need for theories when sadly there is real-world data:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoli_Bugorski#Particle_accel...


The U-70 did, iirc, 70 GeV. A bit under a hundred times less energy per proton, and with an unknown number number of total protons. (Technical data is a bit light on the ground for a 50 year old Soviet particle accelerator.)


More, with pictures, Russian but you can use Google Translate:

Personal Chernobyl Of Analtoli Bugorski

http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/gdobserver/post132042939/


That's incredible, poor guy. It doesn't sound like he got a great deal of compensation, either - I'd be fairly hacked off if my face was half-melted off because of someone else's / a machine's incompetence.


He doesn't look very happy in those pictures. A reminder that all sorts of weird stuff can go wrong in life :-(


He is able to function perfectly well, except for the fact that he has occasional complex partial seizures and rare tonic-clonic seizures.

How the hell is that perfectly well!? Sounds like something out of a Monty Python sketch ... oh just some small seizures, but he's fine really. It's perfectly safe to stick your head in a proton beam kids. Perfectly safe.

Really interesting though, I was under the impression the beams needed a very strong magnetic field to remain stable. How come he was able to stick his head in one?


It says "except". Except when he's having his occasional or rare seisures, he's functioning perfectly well.

Which is pretty good, since the initial medical reaction was to watch him die.


Right. This is on par with Phineas Gage - considering that they both had something ridiculous pierce their brain, and shouldn't have expected to survive, they both did pretty okay.


Maybe related are 'criticality accidents', where by accident a critical mass is reached (either by bringing two masses of fissile material together, or by enclosing a fissile mass by a neutron reflector), and someone gets a high dose of radiation, often with lethal result.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticality_accident or http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1106_scr.pd... for a report about the accident in Sarov, where a physicist lost his life.


The question is somewhat complicated by the fact that to reach the beam, you have to be in vacuum...


Lots of comments on this subject in this thread:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1725592


Great stuff, I watched the sixty symbols video only yesterday, which is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NMqPT6oKJ8 for anyone that may be interested.


Da steh’ ich nun, ich armer Thor! Und bin so klug als wie zuvor.


I take it you didn't read the whole article then?

But while losing your life is in question, you would most definitely lose the hand.


That’s what it says but that conclusion doesn’t feel any more solid to me than all those in the video.


Thus confirming that it's actually quiet a difficult problem, important given that quiet a few in the comments on the video suggested they should have definitely knew thing kind of thing off the cuff.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: