I'm not a native English speaker. I forgot that "irrelevant" has a second snarky meaning until I read your comment.
I meant it literally. Ndb solves a problem that an integrated debugger doesn't need to solve because it already knows which files may be relevant, because the developer has them open. This holds for any integrated debugger and is not specific to either VS Code or Ndb. It's a fundamental integrated vs separate thing. I pointed it out because in my opinion, integrated is better exactly for these kinds of reasons (but you're free to disagree, to each their own).
All that said, I think you're quick to take offense, especially given that these are two projects by enormous tech giants. It is good that there's competition here. There's no poor nighttime voluntary open source dev that needs defending here.
FWIW, I'm a native English speaker and I didn't read "irrelevant" as snarky or negative. It just means that in VSCode, it's not a problem that needs solving, which is objectively true and not anything negative about ndb.
I meant it literally. Ndb solves a problem that an integrated debugger doesn't need to solve because it already knows which files may be relevant, because the developer has them open. This holds for any integrated debugger and is not specific to either VS Code or Ndb. It's a fundamental integrated vs separate thing. I pointed it out because in my opinion, integrated is better exactly for these kinds of reasons (but you're free to disagree, to each their own).
All that said, I think you're quick to take offense, especially given that these are two projects by enormous tech giants. It is good that there's competition here. There's no poor nighttime voluntary open source dev that needs defending here.