This is interesting in that here "the normalization of deviance" describes situations where behaviors that can be measured as objectively bad still wind-up normalized through implicit group consensus.
That such deviance still happens suggests strongly that deviance around things that are less clear and less likely to result in harm to the professional would be even more likely to occur. The simplest example is anyone who faces the public and is expected to give full service. It's easy for that to breakdown when it isn't convenient. One can see this today in everyone from bureaucrats to police officers.
That such deviance still happens suggests strongly that deviance around things that are less clear and less likely to result in harm to the professional would be even more likely to occur. The simplest example is anyone who faces the public and is expected to give full service. It's easy for that to breakdown when it isn't convenient. One can see this today in everyone from bureaucrats to police officers.