> IMHO you both go off the opposite ends: No, a generic "developer" isn't badly educated if they don't know C++, but that doesn't mean C++ is some irrelevant language. It's critical for some domains of computing, and widely used.
I never said it was irrelevant, I said it wasn't the mainstream it was in the early 90s. See my post above:
> while still useful for some specific applications, C++ is not a mainstream language anymore.
So are on the same line you and I :
> a generic "developer" isn't badly educated if they don't know C++
I never said it was irrelevant, I said it wasn't the mainstream it was in the early 90s. See my post above:
> while still useful for some specific applications, C++ is not a mainstream language anymore.
So are on the same line you and I :
> a generic "developer" isn't badly educated if they don't know C++