I'm glad they are humble enough to provide that information.
What do you think of the idea that companies that are cheap to run may face stiffer competition and thus never really gain a large chunk of the market, thereby never making it "astronomically" big.
At one point the network effect will come into play as well as consolidations down the line but it's an interesting thought.
What do you think of the idea that companies that are cheap to run may face stiffer competition and thus never really gain a large chunk of the market, thereby never making it "astronomically" big.
At one point the network effect will come into play as well as consolidations down the line but it's an interesting thought.