From the headline I assumed that technicians were literally able to smell whether a chip is new, possibly by it releasing gases shortly after production. It reminded me of the distinct smell of new hard drives when you open the factory sealed pouch.
I was slightly disappointed when I found that the article describes software based testing instead.
Funnily enough, all diodes actually are light emitting, and light receiving, to some extent. It's why diodes are generally in opaque encapsulation. Whether a PN junction is an LED, PV cell or rectifier/switch is a matter of what the design optimises for. Try putting a voltmeter across a glass encased signal diode and shining a strong light on it to see it act as a PV cell. One wouldn't normally use a diode as a PV cell, but if the desired power was very small, a glass encased diode might be used as a cheap PV cell.
Of course chips don’t work if the smoke escapes, internally they operate on smoke. We tested this with a chip socket connected to 120VAC. All the chips that we connected released smoke, and none of them ever worked again.
From tinkering with electronics my brain has imprinted the smell of various components (resistors, capacitors), isolation. I often wonder what effect inhaling those fumes had on me, can't imagine it was a positive one.
It's, uh, a reference to "new car smell" -- the combination of fragrance and volatile outgassing from new plastics that only lasts for a few months after manufacture. Even if you missed the social reference you got the idea: "new hard drive smell" is surely a physically similar effect.
I understood that part of the reference, but "tech" is ambiguous. If it meant "technician", then it would imply to me that the "new memory smell" was both figurative and something that a human nose could detect, in a literal sense.
Reading the article makes it clear that "tech" refers to "technology", making it more likely that the "smell" is purely figurative.
I was slightly disappointed when I found that the article describes software based testing instead.