There are so many presumptions in your comment (and your comment below) that I don't know where to start, but I find it very amusing :)
My original comment was based on the reading of the title of this thread and the first few sentences in the referenced article both of which mention the word learn. I would call all five mentioned books a poor choice to learn CS/programming from. The book by Sedgewick is an especially bad one (he has a few in this line of mixing algorithms with a programming language, and I despise all of them, and would never recommend to anyone for learning anything).
Now your comment is typically something I wouldn't respond to, but in a public forum it's different, so I am taking time to write this.
Calm down, control your emotions, and don't divine too much into the motives behind what people write when you don't take time to even read what is written.
My original comment was based on the reading of the title of this thread and the first few sentences in the referenced article both of which mention the word learn. I would call all five mentioned books a poor choice to learn CS/programming from. The book by Sedgewick is an especially bad one (he has a few in this line of mixing algorithms with a programming language, and I despise all of them, and would never recommend to anyone for learning anything).
Now your comment is typically something I wouldn't respond to, but in a public forum it's different, so I am taking time to write this.
Calm down, control your emotions, and don't divine too much into the motives behind what people write when you don't take time to even read what is written.