> That argument or some other one that is equally dumb on it's face but might work in a court of law
> equally dumb
I was defending why I think there is a 50% shot that Uber could make part B not apply. It seems like you think it is more like a 1% shot which you might be right, I am not a lawyer.
To put it another way, if you're a plumber who is working for a plumbing company, are you doing your plumbing in the office?