> Taking recursion away seems like an unnecessary limitation Modern Cobol doesn'... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		kbp on May 1, 2018 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: It’s COBOL all the way down > Taking recursion away seems like an unnecessary limitation Modern Cobol doesn't seem to have this limitation, eg http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/handhel.... When Cobol originally appeared, call stacks weren't standard, Lisp didn't exist yet, and neither Fortran nor Algol supported recursive functions; it made sense at the time.

jrq on May 1, 2018 [–]

Ohhhhhh, of course!

Gosh, thanks. I sometimes hold historical technology to unfair standards because I'm not thinking about the continuity of it all.

Crazy to think twenty-somethings are out there hacking COBOL!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact