Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, the users of facebook do get the facebook service in exchange for the data they provide.

TANSTAAFL. If you don’t pay with money, you’re paying with something else. Facebook is not a charity. The question is not whether they’re allowed to obtain (non-monetary) payment for using their service, it’s whether it was (and is) clear what the price is.

What irks me is why non of these services allow monetary payment. Why can’t I pay for facebook with the express agreement that none of my data is sold? It wouldn’t have mass market appeal, but it would silence many of the critics. (Same deal for all ad-funded platforms: just let me pay with money instead of time or attention.)



FB income : 15,920,000,000$ [1]

FB users : 2,129,000,000 [2]

$7.47/year

This is quite affordable. Curious how would marketing companies react to such idea.

[1] https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/fb/financials?query=income-sta... [2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly...


I keep hearing the argument that the people most likely to pay for not looking at ads, are the most interesting to advertisers.....


And it seems very plausible. I’m sure a HN reader is worth far more than $7.47 a year to Facebook.


>TANSTAAFL.

Bless you?

(Seriously what does this mean?)


There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: