I know this is a slightly insensitive question to ask right now, but assuming that what happened was that the car tried to turn right and the cyclist came from behind and crossed into its path[0]: Who would actually have been in the wrong?
I cycle along paths like this from time to time myself, and I always assume that I should let a turning car pass in front of me. As soon as I see the turn signal I will either fall back or even pass into the car lane to overtake on the other side.
Of course that's in part because I know I would lose the fight anyway, but also because I think I am not actually supposed to be "overtaking" them on the right side, so they have the right of way before me.
Depending on the state law, the right-turning car probably is supposed to yield to a cyclist in the bike lane going straight. But of course, every experienced cyclist knows that what is right is not what is safe; you should aim to travel just behind the car's rear bumper to give yourself time to stop if they swerve right.
This is the insanity of (most) bike lanes, that you have a lane to the right of a right-turn lane that can go straight. And that's why I don't use most bike lanes. They're trouble.
I cycle along paths like this from time to time myself, and I always assume that I should let a turning car pass in front of me. As soon as I see the turn signal I will either fall back or even pass into the car lane to overtake on the other side.
Of course that's in part because I know I would lose the fight anyway, but also because I think I am not actually supposed to be "overtaking" them on the right side, so they have the right of way before me.
What do the rules say in this case?
[0] This is based on this link posted elsewhere: https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4370667,-111.9430321,3a,75y,...