Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

What would that indirect chemical evidence look like? Perhaps an example you have in mind? Outside of non-committal elements like Uranium or something showing up, I'm not sure what that evidence would look like?



Oxygen would be one. Due to its reactivity, free oxygen is rare, and oxygen spectra may be evidence of respiration.


It would not be sufficient to be a proof of evidence. Oxygen could come from various sources.


No, but in keeping with the "earth-like" avenue of search... If there are other similarities to earth's chemistry (like having water), and we know earth's oxygen comes from breathing... Not evidence, but a good enough reason to look for some. How that happens, idk.


Pretty sure atmospheric oxygen can be produced from weathering of silicon dioxide.


Why wouldn’t it get bound up with carbon or iron or aluminum etc etc


Yeah but what exoplanet is going to have more oxygen sources than sinks? Just look at Mars, tons of oxygen, but none of it free oxygen.


> evidence of respiration.

Evidence of photosynthesis as well!


Yeah O2 is an input of cellular respiration. The presence of O2 is more likely an indicator of plant-life than it is an indicator of animal life. But plant life is still life.

You do not need animals to have plants. Plants came before animals here on earth. But I’m not sure of a way for animals to exist without plants. So yeah a stronger indicator of photosynthesis than cellular respiration.


Photosynthetic plants without roots.

Conscious Venus Flytraps that seek after other plants to enhance their vitamins.


Methane. It is only really transiently generated by geological means and decays quickly when exposed to cosmic radiation. It is also very likely made by any carbon based life ecosystem.


Titan’s athmosphere contains non-trivial amounts of methane but no signs of life so far.


The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and so on. We don't know for sure there isn't life on Titan; we just haven't seen enough evidence yet.


We can apply the same logic to draw a number of other useless conclusions.


Rather, we can apply the same logic to "not yet draw conclusions", though I do agree with you that not being able to draw conclusions, is useless.


A CO2 increase during just a few years of observation? :) and resulting shift of the planet's black body radiation.


How about silicon (from the reflections off of orbiting satellite solar panels)?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: