Exactly. I do the same. So I don't think that the concept is out of the realm of possibility.
Generally, anarchists acknowledge that there'd have to be a lot of social change before a state of anarchy could actually come about. If the government disappeared today, it'd be total chaos. Kind of like how I'd advocate for a total abolition of the prohibition of drugs; such a transition couldn't happen right away, it'd have to happen over a period of time.
An anarchistic society would have to be significantly different than our own. I think it'd end up being much like the Internet; there'd be a large number of very small communities. A decentralized network.
I'm not sure if this would ever come about or not.
Anarchism only works if everyone is honest and peaceful.
Not everyone is honest and peaceful.
Therefore anarchism is a naive governmental/philosophical system.
Also, on the internet, people steal shit from each other, hack in and destroy people's systems, commit fraud (phishing), and threaten to kill/harm one another all the time.
Thank you, but I'd rather live in a world where there exists an entity that protects property rights.
