(Off-topic for OP, on-topic for the above interesting comment..)
I've looked at the windowing options on a typical oscilloscope. (The Tektronix MSO 3014 is the one we happen to use in our lab.) Hanning window, Hamming window, Blackman-Harris, etc.
I'm wondering how much of the off-frequency noise in a typical signal is due to the discontinuity at the end/beginning of the fragment of the signal captured by the scope.
If it turns out that the discontinuity is the dominant source, there may be a straightforward way to avoid it.
A way to eliminate the discontinuity is to capture the data from the scope, transfer it to a computer, and trim the file so that it is a multiple of the fundamental frequency in length.
Then, use a mixed-radix FFT algorithm on the resulting file.
(It may be necessary to add or subtract a few lines from the file to ensure that the length of the file does not have large prime factors. Mixed-radix FFT is quadratic in the largest prime factor of the size of the input.)
Is this common practice? Or, are there reasons other than masking the effect of the boundary discontinuity that people typically use windowing functions?
What fundamental frequency? If your signal is a mixture of frequency you care about and some other random ones, the random ones will generate lot of discontinuity if you tune the period to the interesting one. Also, if you're slightly off with your estimation of the interesting frequency, your signal will not match up.
Using a window trades off sensitivity for low frequencies and a slight bit of frequency resolution against these problems.
I've looked at the windowing options on a typical oscilloscope. (The Tektronix MSO 3014 is the one we happen to use in our lab.) Hanning window, Hamming window, Blackman-Harris, etc.
I'm wondering how much of the off-frequency noise in a typical signal is due to the discontinuity at the end/beginning of the fragment of the signal captured by the scope.
If it turns out that the discontinuity is the dominant source, there may be a straightforward way to avoid it.
A way to eliminate the discontinuity is to capture the data from the scope, transfer it to a computer, and trim the file so that it is a multiple of the fundamental frequency in length.
Then, use a mixed-radix FFT algorithm on the resulting file.
(It may be necessary to add or subtract a few lines from the file to ensure that the length of the file does not have large prime factors. Mixed-radix FFT is quadratic in the largest prime factor of the size of the input.)
Is this common practice? Or, are there reasons other than masking the effect of the boundary discontinuity that people typically use windowing functions?