Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Definitely agree that people should be responsible when offering health advice - but if you’re striking down advice that:

1) ultimately came from a professional 2) was linked to a program with a bunch of literature

You risk your “Pseudoscience!” claim becoming unfalsifiable. What would it take to be, in your eyes, Not Pseudoscience? A direct link to a paper on this exact algorithm?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: