Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Well, according to Wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Piller_order

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Piller_order#Canada

an Anton Piller Order has a whole lot of "guarantees" for the "defendant".

In this specific case it seems like the behaviour of the "Independent Supervising Solicitor" was far different from the one the Law assigns him/her.

See also:

http://www.mnp.ca/en/posts/civil-search-warrants-in-canada-g...

It seems to me like any and all forms of "interrogation" of the defendant, let alone not allowing him to counsel are totally arbitrary and out of scope/boundaries of such order.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: