Is this a real concern of ordinary people? I am not a movie expert, just somebody who watches movies a lot and I have never thought to myself "this new movie with 48fps doesn't look like a movie, it's too lifelike, not cinematic enough".
I assume people who think like that would be very marginal minority of movie experts. I don't believe average viewer would even think of such argument.
It's the opposite, actually. "Experts" are pushing for higher framerates, but "average viewers" complain that something feels wrong, home-video-y, and just plain weird on high-FPS movies. They can't put their finger on it, they certainly won't mention the framerate, but they tend not to like it.
Because ordinary people don't spend the time to appreciate it, it just look too different for them. Exactly how color movies looked too different at the time.
Not true. This pattern is the same you saw with iPhone "nobody would use that" or CDs or ipads, or video games or ... there are always people who are against progress.
It's not a technical argument they make, it's just a gut reaction to 48fps looking different. The fact that it's more lifelike can actually make it feel fake, because it can feel like you're watching actors on a set.
Personally I do think people will get over it eventually, especially for less "cinematic" stuff. Or possibly variable framerate will become a thing, and directors will choose different framerates for different effects.
I see. I remember seeing Hobbit movies for the first time and they looked slightly different from other movies. But to me it seemed like a better quality so I didn't complain.
Though, I heard some people say that scenes in old LOTR movies looked more realistic. This was mostly because Hobbit used more CGI though, for example orcs in Hobbit movies were all CGI but before in LOTR they had real actors to play orcs.
> The fact that it's more lifelike can actually make it feel fake, because it can feel like you're watching actors on a set.
I personally didn't get that feeling either. Just got a feeling of "it looks better". Especially that dragon scene.
> variable framerate will become a thing
It already is a thing with slow motions, but it is not what you're thinking of.
Have you ever tried to do slow motion with a 30fps video? It doesn't look good. So your idea will probably look bad, inserting 24fps sequences in a 60fps movie will just look laggy.
I assume people who think like that would be very marginal minority of movie experts. I don't believe average viewer would even think of such argument.