What about all the market rules that were originally created to protect specific (groups of) corporations from competition?
I'd argue they should change in response to challenges by new entrants, unless actually necessary to deliver some actually valuable benefit to the public.
Stopping corporate-driven regulatory change now just locks in the position of whoever got their regulatory capture done early.
I'd argue they should change in response to challenges by new entrants, unless actually necessary to deliver some actually valuable benefit to the public.
Stopping corporate-driven regulatory change now just locks in the position of whoever got their regulatory capture done early.