This looks nice (and has many knowledgable people say so) and simple, so I don't want to come off as too much of a critic.
But, can I just say that I think the use of "real time" for an interactive color picker is a bit over the top?
I mean, what would the opposite be? You click a color, then one hour later you get an e-mail? Color picking in one shape or another has been done for 30+ years[1], and it has always been real-time, it's a basic interactive tool when working with computer images.
I realize it maps the color from a camera-fed image to a human-readable name (which perhaps wasn't always done in the past), but that's still not an operation I'd expect to have to wait for, not even when running on a mobile phone.
In short, I think those two words should be removed.
[1] This number is only slightly out of thin air; I picked colors on my Amiga in the late 80s.
But, can I just say that I think the use of "real time" for an interactive color picker is a bit over the top?
I mean, what would the opposite be? You click a color, then one hour later you get an e-mail? Color picking in one shape or another has been done for 30+ years[1], and it has always been real-time, it's a basic interactive tool when working with computer images.
I realize it maps the color from a camera-fed image to a human-readable name (which perhaps wasn't always done in the past), but that's still not an operation I'd expect to have to wait for, not even when running on a mobile phone.
In short, I think those two words should be removed.
[1] This number is only slightly out of thin air; I picked colors on my Amiga in the late 80s.