Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I work at an advertiser. Most so called "viral" ads we've researched involve significant levels of paid impressions before they got to a "viralable" level. There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

Also it's significantly difficult to make a highly entertaining ad as well as convey your product benefits/superiority at the same time - strains creativity of the ad agencies though some are adapting faster to the online ad formats more than others.

At the end of the day all those "emotional equities" that highly engaging and emotional ads convey have mainly a role in creating a positive image around your brand - making people actually buy is very difficult without actually conveying your product's value and benefits.



Who would have thought that actually adding value to peoples lives is hard. Much harder than paying someone to force others to see something.


Sarcasm aside, sadly, if you build it they will come doesn't particularly work.

Say you're made a new flavor of ketchup. Your product tests show people love it much better than anything else in the market. Arguably you are adding value to those people's lives with it.

Now it won't sell at all and recoup your investment and arguably actually add value to people's lives unless they know about it and try it - hence advertising.


One of the wierd things about a network is that, no matter how much you scale it, there are always only ten "top ten" slots on it.

(Or 100, or 1,000, or ...)

Clearly, we're going to have to throw more resources at this problem to break a stubborn scaling bottleneck.


> There ain't no such thing as a free lunch.

You can't even pay to have people watch your ads anymore. Isn't this the death of the industry as we know it?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: