Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's the problem. Science fiction told us we would have robots doing all the work for us but most left out the part about 1% owning all the robots. That's not sustainable.


It is actually the very definition of sustainability because cheaper robots drive down the price of future robots. What were you trying to say?


He was trying to say that the cheaper robots better have weapons ;)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: