> If you want to refute it, why not say what you think is wrong with each of the prescriptions instead of just saying "most of it is bad"?
That is what's wrong with them: if you follow them you'll end up writing worse code for no good reason. I would be a lot more interested in discussing the reasons the author might have had, but they don't present them, so there's little to discuss there.
That is what's wrong with them: if you follow them you'll end up writing worse code for no good reason. I would be a lot more interested in discussing the reasons the author might have had, but they don't present them, so there's little to discuss there.