Are you being ironic, or are you actually calling for deposing of world leaders by force in the name of peace?
Here's your irony; deposing of world leaders by force in the name of peace is exactly the practice of the US, the UK and other such nations that causes so much trouble. Although it does seem to be less fashionable than it was; I suppose even our system can't spin away the colossal failures. I remember when Iraq was going to be a western liberal democracy in a year.
I read it as rhetorical, not literal. As in, where are the threats? Who is going to make the weak decisions and can we avoid giving them the opportunity to do so?
You see how this could confuse people who are reading this post, right?