Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes, this is a problem. I think the solution might be to have a 'vouch' style link on stories that get penalized this way, so users can say whether they really are flamewars or not. If they aren't, the penalty should come off. We do this manually today, but we don't always see the thread in time.

Of course that leaves the harder problem that some of those threads are flamewars rather than civil conversations, as the guidelines call for. But fortunately that's not always true.



That could help. And maybe adjusting the threshold for flamewar detection - with the "hide subthread" functionality the cost of a flamewar might be somewhat lower.

Thanks again for sharing your learnings. Unsurprisingly I have some thoughts of my own, but first I'm curious about what others have learned ...

https://news.ycombinator.com/edit?id=13132782


Limiting comments per user per thread or subthread, or rate-limiting them, might help.


I'd be very interested in reading how you determine whether or not something is a flamewar algorithmically.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: