This was first brought to my attention through an article at Popular Mechanics [1]. Comparing the differences between the writing and focus of the two articles leads to interesting idiosyncracies. Ars Technica seems to emphasize the challenge of combining these enzymes to produce a new cycle. It's not technical, but it does allude to some techniques.
Pop Mech emphasizes how much more carbon gets taken out of the air, compared to photosnythesis. An indication of their attention to scientific content comes from their description of the methodology:
> To oversimplify matters, they mixed together all their enzymes with some chemical fuel and calculated how much CO2 was being pulled out of the air.
I actually didn't realize these were talking about the same paper until I noticed that I had opened up the same link to the original paper twice.
Pop Mech emphasizes how much more carbon gets taken out of the air, compared to photosnythesis. An indication of their attention to scientific content comes from their description of the methodology:
> To oversimplify matters, they mixed together all their enzymes with some chemical fuel and calculated how much CO2 was being pulled out of the air.
I actually didn't realize these were talking about the same paper until I noticed that I had opened up the same link to the original paper twice.
[1]:http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a23938/fix-ca...