Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

As someone entirely unfamiliar, why only six? If the weakness is all of them colluding, then wouldn't adding anybody in the world (let's say, me) as a seventh make it strictly better?



> why only six

The protocol is expensive; it took 2 days with 6 people. After a certain point, it's not practical to add more participants without increasing risk. It requires gigabytes worth of communication per participant and many millions of curve operations.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: