Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

One of my friends had an interesting remark about the "privacy opt outs". It's that google always tracks you, no matter what checkbox you check or uncheck. Why not use the data they are already collecting about you to improve your daily life then.


Why is your friend saying that? Is there any proof that Google is not taking those privacy options into consideration?


Anonymized data is more comfortable than identified data.


Anonymized how? Even if you don't log in, Google can probably figure out with 99.99% accuracy who you really are.


Out of habit, I tend to always use a not-logged in state for everything, and if I need a particular service (including Google), I do so in an Incognito window.

However, I don't use a VPN or spoof my User Agent. Google 100% knows who I am without using any fancy tricks. I've wondered -- wouldn't I be better off logging in everywhere, with my Google privacy settings flipped to maximum? While it's certainly possible for them to map my fingerprint back to my account(s) and opt-out preferences, I think that's a bit much to expect for them. I might be shooting myself in the foot by always being logged out!


There is no such thing as "anonymized data". There's only "insufficient data to cross-correlate the identities back".




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: