It's sort of like asking "what is a celebrity"? There's a line somewhere, and the existence of paparazzi doesn't impact the privacy rights of ordinary people.
The political line is somewhere over the level of voting, and could be somewhere below the level of donating millions and giving speeches to millions.
There's no reason the line inherently has to be drawn at the limit of "legitimate" behavior. We can say that something is legitimate to do, and legitimate to affect who will do business with you.
The political line is somewhere over the level of voting, and could be somewhere below the level of donating millions and giving speeches to millions.
There's no reason the line inherently has to be drawn at the limit of "legitimate" behavior. We can say that something is legitimate to do, and legitimate to affect who will do business with you.