Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Honestly, you should try kubernetes. The experience is pretty much the same and the feature set is much more mature.



My experience with Kubernetes is limited, so take all this with a grain of salt. I've been using the integrated swarm since beta.

The new integrated swarm is a real game-changer in that it is much simpler to use compared to other solutions. With swarm, it's simply:

    docker swarm init
    docker swarm join --token <blah> <blah:2377>  
That being said, I found that Kubernetes offers more granularity in the level of control over the cluster. That's not something that __I__ need necessarily, though obviously YMMV.


I've had the same great, simple experience with Flynn. The terminal commands you give are barely different from Flynn's. And I like Flynn's capabilities better, at least for now. They've already figured out the routing fabric (unlike Docker, per the article) and they have a great redundant DB capability, sorely missing from other PaaSes, even k8s.

I have no doubt that docker will eventually catch up though.


That's cool. I've never looked at Flynn, but you've motivated me to give it a look!


People are working one this feature for kubernetes:

  kubeadm init master
  kubeadm join node --token=73R2SIPM739TNZOA <master-ip>
https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/30360




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: