Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'll post to this thread because this is very relevant for the hiring companies. Hunter and Schmidt did a meta-study of 85 years of research on hiring criteria. [1]

There are three attributes you need to select for to identify performing employees in intellectual fields.

  - General mental ability (Are they generally smart)
    Use WAIS or if there are artifacts of GMA(Complex work they've done themselves) available use them as proxies. 
    Using IQ is mostly illegal[2] in the US, so you'll have to find a test that acts as a good proxy.

  - Work sample test. NOT HAZING! As close as possible to the actual work they'd be doing. Try to make it apples-to-apples comparison across candidates. Also, try and make accomidations for candidates not knowing your company shibboleth.

  - Integrity. The first two won't matter if you hire  a sociopath.
     There are existing tests available for this, you can purchase for < $50 per use.
This alone will get you > 65% hit rate [1], and can be done inside of three hours. There's no need for day long (or multi-day) gladiator style gauntlets.

[1] http://mavweb.mnsu.edu/howard/Schmidt%20and%20Hunter%201998%...

[2] The illegality comes from IQ tests disadvantaging certain minority groups.



"That might work great for other companies, but..."


Indeed. The people that most need this advice simply won't take it.

The three most dangerous sentences in the world

  "That might work great for other companies, but..."

  "That's how we've always done it."

  "Unfortunately it's not that simple."
Also this storify from patio11 is /very/ relevant.

https://storify.com/dgempesaw/sales-vs-hiring-via-patio11




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: