>Perhaps you don't think you could "just as well" program in assembly language, but there are many many people who do, perhaps not in your own problem domain.
I don't think it matters if there are "many people who do" -- as long as they are still a small minority compared to those who don't. After all you can find people believing everything, I'm sure some are even writing web apps in Assembly.
That said, C to Assembly (as opposed to binary executive) could be said to be transpiling too -- from "portable assembly to assembly".
Err, number of people agreeing on a specific meaning is exactly what determines the definitions of a word.
Same for usage of things.
There were always be outliers for whom a thing is better used for Y rather than X, but in the end is what the majority sees the tool as useful for that determines how it's defined (in casual use, dictionaries etc).
I don't think it matters if there are "many people who do" -- as long as they are still a small minority compared to those who don't. After all you can find people believing everything, I'm sure some are even writing web apps in Assembly.
That said, C to Assembly (as opposed to binary executive) could be said to be transpiling too -- from "portable assembly to assembly".