> The government gets labor at nearly zero marginal cost since it would be payin... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		lxm on Aug 12, 2016 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: The brave new world of robots and lost jobs > The government gets labor at nearly zero marginal cost since it would be paying those people even if it didn't put them to work. The motivation for the overseers is clear. The worker bees have two choices - work hard (and get paid) versus do nothing (and get paid). Why would the workers go for the former versus the latter?

dragonwriter on Aug 12, 2016 [–]

Presumably, when ordered to work, the benefits would be cut off if the work was refused or performed unacceptably.

I mean, otherwise this whole mandatory-work-for-benefits thing doesn't make any sense (not to say that its a good idea even then.)

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact