Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

F9 is not believed to have any information from ground sources during descent, based on FCC filings. The altitude of the barge only changes by a meter or so in decent seas, and the legs can withstand a drop of several meters, so probably they target sea level +N, where N is the maximum expected height of the deck.



Wait, really? They just punch in the coordinates and that's it? Cameras or radar or anything?


The ship can hold position to within less than a meter. It's easier to just plan the position beforehand than try to have the rocket receive the ship's position in realtime somehow.

It's interesting to consider how much more difficult this stuff would be without the GPS satellites already in space.


You'd think they'd want some redundancy though. Do they really do it only based on GPS, or do they have other optical/radar/radio systems?

Also does the US government give SpaceX access to the military GPS signals?


It has very good inertial guidance as well. The GPS is probably the best available; considering they launch GPS satellites, I'd expect they aren't restricted. However, civilian GPS use isn't really much different anymore; intentional degradation was turned off in 2000, though certain dynamic limits still apply on the receiver side.


I don't know if they care too much about redundancy. The landing is still very much optional, after all. They have no redundancy in case of engine failure for this phase, which is probably much more likely. GPS is kind of inherently redundant anyway, as long as you have multiple receivers. You need four satellites for positioning, but way more than that are visible at any given time.


Pretty much. GPS is really good these days. It does have a radar altimeter, but that's only for height.

F9 has demonstrated landing in fog and at night, so visual cues are clearly unnecessary.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: