>We have "AI" that can drive a car or a copter, play Chess or Go, translate speech to text, do image recognition ... but what we mean by human intelligence is something different.
Says who? Who says that "general" intelligence doesn't just mean doing the same glorified statistics with larger search spaces, leading to greater difficulty weighting-and-searching those spaces with statistical data, leading to a greater difficulty writing learning systems that perform well without discovering new statistical principles?
Says who? Who says that "general" intelligence doesn't just mean doing the same glorified statistics with larger search spaces, leading to greater difficulty weighting-and-searching those spaces with statistical data, leading to a greater difficulty writing learning systems that perform well without discovering new statistical principles?