Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You're replying to someone who replied to statements that I didn't make and hoped to argue using both using emotional appeals ("our rights as people) and against emotional appeals -- "those statistics I read on wikipedia 'win the conversation' because I brought them up first (even though they're not related to your point), which means it follows that I can state my opinions as fact."



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: