Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

While making a diff of the AGPL version 3 and GPL version 3, I can't see the point where you are not allowed to run the program. Can you point us to the respective part of the text assuming that fact?

Another important point, the AGPL or GPL license is applicable (not at the execution) only when you are distributing (conveying) the software. The AGPL is just an extension of the distribution nothing to do with the execution of the software.

diff -u gpl-3.0.txt agpl-3.0.txt

    This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
    -    GNU General Public License for more details.
    +    GNU Affero General Public License for more details.

    -    You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
    +    You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
     along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

    Also add information on how to contact you by    electronic and paper mail.

    -  If the program does terminal interaction, make it output a short
    -notice like this when it starts in an interactive mode:
    -
    -    <program>  Copyright (C) <year>  <name of author>
    -    This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `show w'.
    -    This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
    -    under certain conditions; type `show c' for details.
    -
    -The hypothetical commands `show w' and `show c' should show the appropriate
    -parts of the General Public License.  Of course, your program's commands
    -might be different; for a GUI interface, you would use an "about box".
    +  If your software can interact with users remotely through a computer
    +network, you should also make sure that it provides a way for users to
    +get its source.  For example, if your program is a web application, its
    +interface could display a "Source" link that leads users to an archive
    +of the code.  There are many ways you could offer source, and different
    +solutions will be better for different programs; see section 13 for the
    +specific requirements.

    You should also get your employer (if you work as a programmer) or school,
 if any, to sign a "copyright disclaimer" for the program, if necessary.
    -For more information on this, and how to apply and follow the GNU GPL, see
    +For more information on this, and how to apply and follow the GNU AGPL, see
 <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
    -
    -  The GNU General Public License does not permit incorporating your program
    -into proprietary programs.  If your program is a subroutine library, you
    -may consider it more useful to permit linking proprietary applications with
    -the library.  If this is what you want to do, use the GNU Lesser General
    -Public License instead of this License.  But first, please read
    -<http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-not-lgpl.html>.



Clever of you to use diff!

The AGPL is only an extension of the distribution constraints as far as the strings embedded in the program are covered by copyright. It can't use distribution as an enforcement boundary for the code, which never gets sent to the user.

The AGPL has everything to do with the execution of the software. That is its entire purpose! I am not allowed to run the software unless all parties providing it input can get its source, with an advertising clause. Anyone bound by the license does not have Freedom Zero.


If I understand correctly, the issue you see is not related to the AGPL version 3 only but also to the GPL version 3 as the "2. Basic Permissions" are shared between the two licenses. Could you point us to the specific section or sentence disallowing the freedon #0?

Regarding the "enforcement boundary", the AGPL is more there to not abuse the "private use" ("not conveying") of a free software as described here :

http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#UnreleasedMods

In AGPL, You can run the software but if you make it accessible to end-users via a public network in a interactive way, this is considered as conveying.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: