Well, if cities control the zoning, they then have to ensure for the welfare of the housing market. If you, for example, block developers from adding more housing (cough San Francisco), you are supporting raising housing costs and pushing lower income citizens out of your city.
If the market should drive the equation and the municipality meddle with either side of it, it's not a market in the way one normally infers.
If the market should drive the equation and the municipality meddle with either side of it, it's not a market in the way one normally infers.