| | The Doctor Will Sue You Now (2009) [pdf] (badscience.net) |
|
3 points by JoeMalt 5 months ago | past
|
|
| | Statins have no side effects? What our study really found (badscience.net) |
|
4 points by tokenadult on March 14, 2014 | past | 1 comment
|
|
| | RandomiseMe lets anyone design and run a randomised controlled trial (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by gcheong on Dec 16, 2013 | past
|
|
| | Bicycle Helmets and the law: a perfect teaching case for epidemiology (badscience.net) |
|
45 points by biehl on Dec 14, 2013 | past | 58 comments
|
|
| | Building evidence inot education (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by ColinWright on March 15, 2013 | past
|
|
| | Ben Goldacre: Here’s the foreword to my new book, Bad Pharma (badscience.net) |
|
146 points by bootload on Sept 25, 2012 | past | 85 comments
|
|
| | Why won’t Prof. Susan Greenfield publish this theory in a scientific journal? (badscience.net) |
|
2 points by bootload on Sept 8, 2012 | past
|
|
| | Here’s our Cabinet Office paper on randomised trials of government policies (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by tokenadult on June 23, 2012 | past
|
|
| | Matthias Rath – steal this chapter (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by shrikant on May 31, 2012 | past
|
|
| | The golden arse beam method (badscience.net) |
|
2 points by MaysonL on Feb 13, 2012 | past
|
|
| | Traps in Data Journalism (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by tokenadult on Jan 3, 2012 | past | 2 comments
|
|
| | 50% of neuroscience papers suffer from a major statistical error. (badscience.net) |
|
182 points by zacharyvoase on Nov 28, 2011 | past | 94 comments
|
|
| | Testing Treatments: Best Popular Book on Evidence-Based Medicine (badscience.net) |
|
2 points by tokenadult on Oct 20, 2011 | past
|
|
| | The Doctor Will Sue You Now (badscience.net) |
|
2 points by shrikant on Sept 29, 2011 | past
|
|
| | Benford’s Law: using stats to bust an entire nation for naughtiness (badscience.net) |
|
2 points by baha_man on Sept 23, 2011 | past
|
|
| | Academic papers are hidden from the public. Here's some direct action. (badscience.net) |
|
156 points by ColinWright on Sept 16, 2011 | past | 50 comments
|
|
| | Brain imaging studies report more positive findings than numbers support (badscience.net) |
|
2 points by baha_man on Aug 26, 2011 | past
|
|
| | Sampling error, the unspoken issue behind small number changes in the news (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by baha_man on Aug 22, 2011 | past
|
|
| | I foresee that nobody will do anything about this problem (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by ColinWright on July 16, 2011 | past
|
|
| | There's something magical about watching patterns emerge from data (badscience.net) |
|
5 points by ColinWright on June 23, 2011 | past
|
|
| | Kids who spot bullshit, and the adults who get upset about it (badscience.net) |
|
330 points by baha_man on June 4, 2011 | past | 133 comments
|
|
| | Existential Angst Biases (badscience.net) |
|
2 points by JonnieCache on May 27, 2011 | past
|
|
| | We should so blatantly do more randomised trials on policy – Bad Science (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by ColinWright on May 23, 2011 | past
|
|
| | How to read a paper (badscience.net) |
|
2 points by strayer on April 20, 2011 | past
|
|
| | When journalists do primary research (badscience.net) |
|
5 points by baha_man on April 9, 2011 | past
|
|
| | Anarchy for the UK. Ish. (badscience.net) |
|
1 point by baha_man on April 3, 2011 | past
|
|
| | When ethics committees kill (badscience.net) |
|
52 points by baha_man on March 26, 2011 | past | 13 comments
|
|
| | Why don’t journalists link to primary sources? (badscience.net) |
|
173 points by baha_man on March 19, 2011 | past | 51 comments
|
|
| | Why cigarette packs matter (badscience.net) |
|
79 points by baha_man on March 12, 2011 | past | 35 comments
|
|
| | You’re ooonly cheating yourself – Bad Science (badscience.net) |
|
3 points by trbecker on Feb 28, 2011 | past
|
|
|
|
More |
