i've been seeing this trend lately. it's not limited to the crypto niche. i've seen other ways they were trying to hijack people's identity to sell whatever thing they're trying to promote
edit: also there was an instance in the past where my account got disabled and it took me months to get my account get reactivated again. the first issue is that they have a huge backlog of other people they are assisting. so you need to find a way around that
I've taken a lot of courses on story writing / telling. I still suck at it
There are fundamentals in story writing / telling. Depends on the medium you are using. You prob know all of this.
So, one thing that I've noticed is that people who are actually good at this is that they do it as their main passion. So, practice and see how others are doing it. Also get feedback. Telling stories is not a passive activity
Reading about what makes a good story was somewhat interesting to me and i thought just reading and knowing about it would make me better. If you don't do the thing that makes you better and just read about it's prob a passive activity
Btw, people I know who really loves stories wether sharing or writing can consume over 150 fiction books a year. Doing 100 a year was already insurmountable for me, so I gave up on that.
It all depends on the product, designers, market, product owners, marketing team, and target audiences
Some products would have different funnel for the lifecycle of their product. Sometimes it might make sense to do one thing for a specific funnel and might not on a different context.
However, that assumes we are making decisions based on data.
Sometimes a team / company can will make decisions even if it is not optimal in terms of conversations because that's what they feel like doing.
What would you use them for, and how much are you willing to spend? Classic cars and italian sport cars don't have digital gimmicks, as well as american muscle. If you really want something without digital gimmicks get a motorcycle. People who really don't want to be tracked have a motorcycle.
To answer your question, it depends on what you plan to do with the car and how much you want to spend.
Toyota, Honda, Jeep, Porsche, Ford, Ferrari, Chevy.
I think you will always need a trip to the dealership and it won't even always be an issue with your infotainment. The exception is if you know how a lot about cars.
Also, people don't need your car technology to track you. I know people who lost 10k of camera equipment in their car because they were targeted using other attack vectors.
I have tesla at the moment and it has a lot of digital gimmicks. I am thinking of going into porsche or c8 in the next few months.
You brought up a really good question about privacy. I'm seeking some wisdom about that too. I know that my location, supercharging, and trips are tracked. Prob even sentry might be watched by a content moderator at tesla.
Now, let's say i switch to a porsche or a c8. Wouldn't i still have privacy risks? The risks are, my cellphone, wifi, bluetooth, credit cards, data brokers, cookies, in-store purchases, transactions, or even more sophisticated attack like using people i know as another vector.
You can even track people on the blockchain. I think the exception would be something like monero.
So, I guess can someone more knowledgable share info about the issues privacy issues with tech gadgets in cars. How big of an issue is it if you are already completely integrated in modern tech society?
Thanks man, yeah I spoke with a dealer. It seems somewhat easier now since people are waiting for the z06. But, still the dealership charging way over the msrp is still a big issue
Author's opinion is subjective and falls under selection bias.
There's a lot of famous people that don't use wired headphones
For the wireless argument, here is mine.
I use an airpods pro. I also have multiple high end headphones. I only apple os with wireless. If I was using linux, android, windows then I have to use my other headphones, since my bluetooth always have issues with wireless using other os.
The airpods pro is probbably my favourite headphones that I have. I use it 95% of the time
The only time I use wired headphones is if I need to use my amp when I really need/want to listen to the quality of something or if im using non apple os.
Wires are a pain in the a$% for me personally and ironically more fragile than my airpods pro. It's hard to move around with wires and they tangle a lot wether if im wearing them or not.
The airpods pro are small and you can have noice cancelling, transparency, and normal mode. The only downside is I have to charge them every 5~ hours.
They connect to my phone, and my 3 computers easily without unhooking the wires.
The only annoying thing about the airpods pro is that people don't know that i have something in my ear because my hair is long and I am listening to something. When they are trying to start a conversation I usually can't hear them.
The only time they fall out of my ears is if im cleaning the house cause im moving my head around too much. They don't even fall when I'm working out or running
People like what they like. Forcing it just does not go well, unless the reasons are really good.
I was, and am seriously put off by the omission of analog audio jacks. Most of the reasons given just do not resonate and sometimes it is stated or strongly implied I am somehow the problem.
Likewise. My son and I both ditched iPhones when Apple took away the headphone jack. How else are we supposed to use our phones to listen to music in our cars? (My car's bluetooth only works for phone functions, not music, and my son's doesn't even have that option).
I've connected a cheap (~15€) Bluetooth audio receiver to the Aux-In. No phone functionality, but I always ignore calls and texts while driving (and some of the time not driving) anyways
I did try that, but the quality was dreadful and it's just something else needing recharging/eating batteries.
The decision to drop a universally supported headphone jack really doesn't make any sense unless you are trying to force people to buy your expensive wireless ear-buds, (which I can't wear because they are uncomfortable and fall out of my ears within seconds).
When I rent newer cars, which I do frequently, I am amazed at the diversity of general conbobtwinkulating required to connect, looking hard at you Dodge, and quality, latency is never worth the hassle.
There is a BT cassette adapter, believe it or not. Tried it an old Audi we had that still had a deck in it. It worked but the charging cable couldn’t stay plugged in while cassette was loaded, and if you left it in car in cold temps of course battery would turn to rubbish pretty quickly. However, it’s awesome that this exist[s/ed]. I thought there must be a way for some bright engineer to get the thing to gen power from the rotation of the tape reels and just dump the need to charge as often or at all.
You're right in theory. In practice that either means a battery in the headphones and/or a new audio cable. I'm sure this has been tried before. It seems like something Sony would try--maybe Lighting headphones would count?
> Author's opinion is subjective and falls under selection bias. There's a lot of famous people that don't use wired headphones
That's pretty obvious. The article gave that for granted (actually, it even explicitly acknowledged it) and put the spot on famous or not so famous people going the other way round. They will be always be a minority and guided by fashion/aesthetics rather than comfort, but it was worth (or not) to point it out.
A data lake can be home to many different data formats e.g. parquet, AVRO, Thrift, protobuf, ORC, HDF5S, CSV, JSON all co-existing together. Spark lets you create a virtual abstraction over all of this, and query it as though it was a homogeneous database. There's no need to import data into a centralized format and schema.
This really all ties back to the "old" Hadoop days, and is an evolution of compute over data not in a fixed and managed format/schema.
I'd like to add some points:
Ive used Snowflake for several years. Snowflake works with structured and semi-structured data (think spreadsheets and JSON). I've never tried working with pics or videos - and I'm not sure it would make sense to do that.
I've evaluated Databricks. It works with the above mentioned structured and semi-structured data. I also suspect it could process unstructured data. My understanding is that it runs Python (and some others), so you can do any "Python stuff, but in the cloud, and on 1000s of computers"
Databricks used to be an Apache Spark as a service company. And Spark is a predominantly Scala code base. PySpark is just a Python binding for the real engine popular in ML circles. In the last couple of years the Databricks platform migrated from open-source Spark to a new proprietary engine written in C++.
Was it warren that said investing money on people is the best investment?
i can kinda see how coding bootcamps are exploiting this
in my case when i have to occasionally financially support my siblings so that they can have better employment opportunities, those seems to be more rewarding for me personally even if i never see that money again. i dont think id invest money on strangers unless i get a crazy roi like some bootcamps
edit: also there was an instance in the past where my account got disabled and it took me months to get my account get reactivated again. the first issue is that they have a huge backlog of other people they are assisting. so you need to find a way around that