Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | x0n's comments login

silk road was on the dark web, a place that is oriented 100% around anonymity. This precludes any sort of "elimination of fraudulent reviews" since there's no reasonable way to build any sort of chain of trust.


I explained several ideas to eliminate fraudulent reviews in my comment, that you didn't address. The main thing is to make a review coupled with a purchase that involves a large cut to the platform, so each review is very expensive. Secondly, don't take reviewers themselves seriously unless they've also made a large overall number of purchases to a diversity of sellers- making becoming a credible reviewer also expensive.


The dark web is based around network anonymity.

You can find, and log into, your facebook account, should you have one, here, where I'm sure you would be quite identifiable.

facebookwkhpilnemxj7asaniu7vnjjbiltxjqhye3mhbshg7kx5tfyd dot onion


anonymity doesn't preclude chain-of-trust (really "reputation"). after all, anonymity only means "can't be linked to real-life identity".


Apparently it's more of a 1.75ply search according to the author :)

Try: c4, Qa4, Qxa5, Qc7, Qxc8# lol


Oh no dude, it's worse than that: c4, Qa4, Qxa5, Qc7, Qxc8# lol


Nice find. I tried to get an even shorter mate, but its tendency to give up its pieces got in the way: 1. e4 e5 2. Bc4 Bc5 3. Qh5 Bxf2+ 4. Ke2 Bxg1 5. Qxf7#

Can anyone get a mate in 4?


Oh, that was easier than expected: 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5 a6 3. Bc4 a5 4. Qxf7# I assume a mate in 3 (or a Fool's mate in 2) is not possible...


1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. d3 Ne4 4. dxe4 a5 5. Ne5 b5 6. Qf3 a4 7. Qf7#

Still, impressive for "a pile of regexen".


c4, Qa4, Qxa5, Qc7, Qxc8# lol


blockchain is too slow and completely inappropriate.


So much fun! Works fine on windows terminal too! mouse, keyb, colours -- all good.


Ahh nice to know! Never managed to test it


There's no compilation (yet?) -- the code is interpreted, so runtime only.


The hyperbollocks marketingspeak in the summary paragraph put me off:

"The key insight of PowerInfer-2 is to utilize the heterogeneous computation, memory, and I/O resources in smartphones by decomposing traditional matrix computations into fine-grained neuron cluster computations. Specifically, PowerInfer-2 features a polymorphic neuron engine that adapts computational strategies for various stages of LLM inference. Additionally, it introduces segmented neuron caching and fine-grained neuron-cluster-level pipelining, which effectively minimize and conceal the overhead caused by I/O operations."

Ahem, what? Let's overload a biological construct "neuron" to imbue it with magical technopowers and then derive the rest of our BS from this. No sale.


Processes can't have children either, since, being a bunch of arithmetic, they lack genitalia. You can't kill them, because they aren't alive. They can't even sleep(1), another biological process fast arithmetic has no use for.

When will the false advertising end?!?


"Neuron" is not out of place when you're talking about software that uses neural networks...


And there's the rub: it's always about the beauty.


It's important to remember though that these words, i.e. "virtual particles" are just words used to convey a-priori what are purely mathematical constructs. It in no way is declaring that such things are tangible instances (e.g. detectable in a cloud chamber or through other empirical means.)


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2025 batch! Applications are open till May 13

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: