Once all the bacteria have done their thing what's left? At this point thousands of years later it probably is solidly within the mud spectrum and closer to the sand end then say lakebottom or swamp mud.
To what degree does this product (or others) look at a collection of documents and offer various possible schema to choose from? This seems like not just a "hard for AI" problem but a "hard for humans" problem. In other words, even a high-quality AI with lots of "thinking" time isn't enough. It isn't just about reasoning through a problem -- there will be a lot of judgment calls. Judgment calls that require significant context and domain knowledge. This to me seems like an area where human-in-the-loop really matters.
"The country is going to have to learn critical thinking. That may be an impossible challenge for the US." (ts 30:57)
"Impossible" is a bold qualifier. Maybe he was exaggerating - maybe not. Will critical thinking necessarily become more difficult - to learn, teach, exercise - with AI? It's possible it will help people become better thinkers, but I don't think that's a guarantee.
Location: Nashville, TN
Remote: OK
Willing to relocate: Yes - preferably in the Southeastern US
Technologies: Python, SQL, JavaScript
Resume: github.com/lawsonpd
Email: ro024gg2h@mozmail.com
About: Generalist, philosopher, pool and chess instructor, wellness advocate