Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more vthallam's commentslogin

Sorry, sometimes its just dumb. it works like this - https://stonks.news/gpt-share/4735/ozk


Thanks for trying and Sorry! It's super early, what works great:

* Screener type queries * Charting(prices, volumes), single company or comparing multiple * Insider transactions from any company * heatmap or top movers today * Earnings data for a certain year and quarter.

There's a bunch of things that also work, but overall we have a long way to go! Please do sign up so we could update you on the next set of features


Thanks for the answer. I signed up and will check it once in a while ! Good luck.


don't have politicians data yet haha! but I plan to add it in the next week:)


Why? Their data is like three months behind. Is that still actionable?


Somewhat. If the options are long-dated, I don't see why they wouldn't be? If Pelosi has calls or puts that are dated a year from now, might make sense to follow the trade if it's a well known company that does business with the government.


Are you on mobile or web? I just checked, once you enter a prompt, you can clear it and then enter a new one. Happy to help look in more detail if you continue to get this error. feel free me to also email at venk at stonks dot news


Thank you! I initially had a single line, but on mobile it was very awkward to edit text and considering there's no app, figured its easier to have elongated text. Also, adding support for longer queries, essentially like if you have a hypothesis, you could validate it a bit using this tool!

> However, when I type into the box after that, that message changes on each keyDown.

thanks for flagging, will fix it soon!


I would personally prefer to submit the query with ENTER and add new lines with SHIFT + ENTER, like in e.g. Slack. (Not on mobile though, of course.)


We do have backtests that run over a long period of time to check the effects of the big changes that were introduced.

Source: I work at Meta.


The other issue is scaling. Will price per ad continue to decrease? If so hwo long can meta continue to increase impressions per user without losing users? Otherwise revenue won't stay flat, it'll decrease.


This is despicable, but titling "Tech CEO" for a digital marketing company is a stretch. FWIW, no one(very few?) actually in tech company would make fun of working mom's or applaud someone for selling their dog.


Google and facebook are digital marketing companies.


Not remotely the same as digital marketing companies that do their work creating ad campaigns for clients. Google and FB are ad platforms whose primary products are software.


They build the tools and platforms for digital marketing, but Google at least, outsources the actual digital marketing to third parties. If you reach out to their sales team for "enterprise" GMP solutions, you'll be connected with a reseller.


#noteveryceo ...


What makes you think there are fewer sociopaths in tech than marketing?


I tend to view marketing as an industry where it is easier to 'fake it til you make it' versus tech or software engineering. But I definitely can see some arguments otherwise. I just view being able to sustain oneself purely on "bullshitting" other people as a bit harder to do in tech only because, typically, tech businesses have to output an actual software product. But I realize there are a handful of counterexamples, I still view those as anecdotal data.

I'll admit, I don't think their is scientific proof one way or the other, I just view "marketing" as an easier industry for "bullshitters" to climb their way to the top.


This might be true (and I agree!) - but there are plenty of forms of sociopathy that are not bullshitting and “faking it until you (maybe) make it”.


Because marketers don't make a product. They're just locked in a zero-sum game for attention. Most tech companies at least start with the goal of improving the world in some way.


Most tech companies post 2000 are marketing companies in disguise, whose only goal is to enshitify products in service of recurring revenue and spy on users to harvest data.

They might have a public statement of “improving the world”, but this is usually a brazen attempt to hide their actual goals.


Marketing is all about manipulation


Noob here. Is this similar to what ChatGPT Retrieval plugin does, but for other LLM's?


LangChain is LLM agnostic. People are using it with Cohere's LLMs and even self-hosted LLMs like LLaMA.


I would say LangChain is similar to ChatGPT itself.

- LangChain's Retriever is analogous to ChatGPT Retrieval Plugin. - In general, LangChain has tools for what ChatGPT calls Plugins. - ChatGPT uses OpenAI's GPT-4 LLM. LangChain uses ... any LLM (i.e. configurable).


It's the backend of retrieval plugin basically


The retrieval plugin does not use LangChain, afaik.


Guess I can't delete my comment but I guess "basically" in this context means a similar type implementation


I work here and wasn't affected. But that's how I saw the severance. Anyone who doesn't have visa issues could literally pursue their ideas for the next 6 months.


>6 months

more like 6 years, unless you're a new grad with no savings, or unless you somehow managed to burn through your 200K/yr salary every year. Probably decades if you migrate to an LCOL.

Edit: oh, you meant 6 months on the severance alone. Yep


Yes, we don't ask DP questions. (I work at FB)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: