Spray painting a bunch of airplanes is terrorism. Got it.
Oh, and don’t come crying when the same authoritarian laws put in place for Palestine Action are used to label your cause as terrorism to quash dissent.
Even if I hadn’t, I surely would have by now given the amount of “gotchas” in this thread using this crime as some kind of smoking gun justification for proscription.
But it is good to know that criminal assault is now equivalent to terrorism.
1) Uh.. not terrorism? Hate crime perhaps, but that should be decided by a jury, not unilaterally determined by the gov.
2) So arms manufacturers participating in a war (at best!) are now equivalent to.. gay establishments? I suggest thinking through your examples before sharing them :)
People want to spend money to fix a problem that fundamentally requires effort on their part, not tech.
Vacuuming is actually the easiest bit of cleaning a house IMO - getting the floor clear (if you have kids, or out of control hobbies, or are just lazy or a bit of a horder) is hard.
People aren't stupid, they kind of know this. But just like buying expensive gym equipment they think that a new toy will incentivise them do the hard bits.
"If I buy a new gizmo I'll finally start cooking healthy delicious food" is a great pitch.
It was “easy” to vacuum before but we never did a thorough job. All too often we just vacuum what we can see, never under the couches, etc.
Now that we have to move everything so it can complete the full map we have a much cleaner house. It encourages us to move all of the chairs, toys, etc.
I worked on an IoT project at one of the big German car makers and it was a mess. More money than sense. They didn't really have any idea why they were putting software into stuff. Just some vague notion that some software systems needed to exist to then present its existence to the next boss up; presumably all the way up and out to investors. Discussing the actual functionality or how the product(s) would actually be experienced in the real world was essentially taboo.
There was a podcast called garbage.fm [1] with one of the hosts working for General Electric at the time it was recorded. It sounded like GE were yet another one of those incumbent companies doing "smart" Internet of Things products just because they were worried about being left behind.
Well, clearly, you know a lot about being a serious enterpreneur. Don't let us luddites drag you down, I'm sure your next 100% vibe coded B2B SaaS will be a massive success.
Nowhere in the article does he explain why the use of AI is inherently problematic or why it necessitates rewriting the project plan. Work product is either good or bad, and responsibility for its quality rests with the person delivering it. The tools used to produce the work are irrelevant. In fact, for those who prioritize execution speed, the use of labor-saving tools should be encouraged wherever feasible.
This comment was generated by chatgpt (inspired by me).
