Many examples of conjectures true for all n, until a very large one is eventually found : https://mathoverflow.net/questions/15444/examples-of-eventua...

Abortion in Poland is legal only in cases when the pregnancy is a result of a criminal act or when the woman's life or health is in danger.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_in_Poland#Legal_sta...

> the IRS tells me what they believe my taxes should be

File for an extension. Then after April 15, download your wage & income transcripts from the IRS. Use that to reconcile with your own records and file before October

I just wanted to add that an extension is not an extension to the time you have to pay your taxes.

So if you file for an extension, don’t pay anything by April 15, and then it turns out you owe $1000 in taxes in October, you will now have to pay $1000 + penalty + interest on the $1000.

Filing for an extension only extends the time to file your taxes. Not the time to pay your taxes (I think the one exception to this was when COVID hit, where even the date to pay taxes was extended, but I’m not a 100% sure).

Wait what? Can you explain this approach a little further?

If you file an extension, after Aprilc 15 you will be able to see on the IES tr

Previous versions such as https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9810162v1 clearly link to the latest withdrawn version, with text in red and bold at the top. Researchers accustomed to the arxiv don't miss it.

Peer reviews don't catch some important mistakes. It does not guarantee much by itself.

I make no claim to peer reviewed journals being better, I simply noted that the linked article asserted that two thirds of arXiv STEM preprints are latter submitted to such journals.

> Previous versions such as https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9810162v1 clearly link to the latest withdrawn version, ...

Thanks for that note; that appears to apply to a succession of papers that each replace a prior version.

The statement made in the linked article that I quoted suggested that papers that are later withdrawn are NOT annotated to identify that have been withdrawn.

If we look to the latest version of that paper:

https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9810162

We can see that the author has added a comment:

> Comments: The paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial mistake in the arguments

but no other "meta" annotation has been added (such as the one you pointed out).

It seems the linked article is asserting that had the author NOT made that comment then there would be no other indication that paper had been withdrawn due to error.

In fact I'm not entirely sure what withdrawn means .. given the paper remains on the site.

Why tag anything at all? If the query is fast you may run the query again. This avoids migrating tags if the query gets modified/improved etc.

i use tags for annotations and actions: this email i need to reply to. that one links to a story i want to read later. etc. it's not possible to search for that without tags, because those states change and don't depend on the actual emails

AFAIK, you need tags at least for read/unread.

I don't really use tags, but have a few searches to archive email from mailing lists without seeing it in my inbox.

For other usecases, I do as you suggested.

Landlords in NYC require pre-tax income of 40 times the monthly rent.

For $5k monthly rent you need $200,000 pre-tax income.

What about traces.vim?

https://github.com/markonm/traces.vim

Cisco vs California is one example with discrimination (no sexual abuse enabling here, though).

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23697083

Most tinder profiles are inactive. The person created a profile long time ago and never logged in the last few years, yet these profiles show up to make you believe so many potential matches are out there.

Start a physical activity in a group with other people and aim to do that 3 times a week. Sport, dancing, etc. Yoga, salsa, tango or other dances for instance, as these are activities that will involve at least as many girls as boys.